|
Fixed Quotes
|
We provide clients with fixed quotes for providing high quality legal services within their budget.
|
|
Highly Responsive
|
We are highly responsive lawyers who provide legal services to meet clients' requirements.
|
|
Expert Legal Advice
|
We provide clients with clear, practical, expert legal advice to achieve their goals.
|
|
Highest Service Levels
|
We meet the highest service levels in providing legal services to clients.
|
|
Minimise Costs
|
We strive to minimise clients' legal, regulatory and commercial risks and costs.
|
|
21 October 2025 - New National Guidance Released for Responsible AI Adoption in AustraliaThe National AI Centre (NAIC) has released the "Guidance for AI Adoption," a crucial framework for Australian businesses integrating artificial intelligence. This guidance is essential for navigating the evolving landscape of AI law, privacy regulations, and the implementation of commercial technologies. Building on the previous Voluntary AI Safety Standard, the new guidance simplifies requirements into six key practices to ensure safe, ethical, and responsible AI deployment. It offers a tiered approach tailored to different maturity levels. The "Foundations" tier provides startups and SMEs with practical steps to establish essential governance and manage risk from the outset. The "Implementation Practices" tier offers detailed technical advice for established corporations scaling complex AI systems. Critically, the guidance includes practical tools, such as AI Policy and Register templates. Adopting these practices is vital for demonstrating regulatory compliance, protecting intellectual property, and mitigating commercial liability when utilising AI in operations or e-commerce platforms.
|
|
9 October 2025 - Federal Court Issues $5.8 Million Penalty in Historic Privacy Act RulingIn a watershed moment for Australian privacy law, the Federal Court ordered Australian Clinical Labs (ACL) to pay $5.8 million in civil penalties concerning a significant data breach in its Medlab Pathology business. This marks the first instance of civil penalties being issued under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). The penalties were imposed due to ACL’s failure to take reasonable steps to protect the personal information of over 223,000 individuals and its failure to conduct a prompt breach assessment. This judgment signals a new era of substantial financial consequences for serious privacy interferences. For technology companies and startups, this precedent underscores the critical importance of robust data governance, 'privacy by design' principles, and comprehensive cybersecurity measures. Organisations must recognise the heightened enforcement landscape, particularly given the significantly increased maximum penalties now in force.
|
|
18 September 2025 - Privacy Commissioner Finds Kmart’s Use of Facial Recognition UnlawfulThe Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has set a critical precedent for the use of artificial intelligence and biometric data in public spaces. The Privacy Commissioner's determination found that Kmart's use of facial recognition technology to combat refund fraud was a breach of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). The ruling establishes that collecting sensitive biometric information from the general public without their explicit, informed consent is not "reasonably necessary" for a company's functions, even for a legitimate purpose like loss prevention. This decision significantly raises the compliance bar for any business deploying AI-driven surveillance or analytics, effectively creating a high-risk category for such technologies. For startups and established tech companies alike, this signals that the legal threshold for deploying public-facing biometric systems is now exceptionally high, demanding a compelling justification and a transparent, opt-in consent model that is operationally challenging in most commercial environments. The ruling will inevitably chill the market for such technologies and force a fundamental rethink of AI-driven customer analytics.
|
|
14 August 2025 - ALRC President: AI Law Reforms Biggest ChallengeIn a major speech delivered at the Australian Law Forum 2025, Justice Mordy Bromberg – President of the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) – warned that the rise of artificial intelligence poses the “largest and most complex law reform exercise” ever faced in Australia. He noted that AI’s ability to affect human behaviour on an unprecedented scale means it will touch almost every area of law. Bromberg outlined the daunting scope of the task: regulators must first identify all the potential harms and risks of AI, then systematically review the entire statute book to see where current laws fall short, and only then develop new legal frameworks to fill those gaps. Unlike past tech advances, AI is “a different species of technology” – one that is trained rather than programmed, granting it a form of autonomy that challenges traditional liability and oversight mechanisms.
|
|
31 July 2025 - New AI Technical Standard to Support Responsible Government AI AdoptionThe Digital Transformation Agency has released the Australian Government’s first AI Technical Standard – a comprehensive framework to ensure federal agencies adopt artificial intelligence in a transparent, accountable and safe manner. The Standard outlines requirements for managing AI systems across their entire lifecycle, from design and development to monitoring and eventual decommissioning. For instance, in the initial “Discover” phase, agencies must address ethical risks, biases, data quality, privacy, and human oversight during system design and training. During “Operate,” agencies need to integrate AI with appropriate safeguards, ensure secure and compliant deployment, and continuously monitor for issues like drift or bias. Finally, the “Retire” phase mandates controlled decommissioning of AI systems, including data retention compliance and risk assessments for transitioning away from the tool.
|
|
10 June 2025 - Statutory Privacy Tort Comes into EffectAustralia has introduced a new statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy, which commenced on 10 June 2025. This legal change gives individuals a new right to sue for serious breaches of privacy, providing an additional avenue for redress in the courts. The tort covers intrusions upon seclusion and misuse of private information, requiring courts to weigh the privacy harm against any countervailing public interest. It also includes defences (such as consent or lawful authority) and exemptions for certain entities like law enforcement and intelligence agencies. For Australian businesses, this development underscores a heightened legal risk for privacy breaches and the importance of robust privacy compliance, as individuals can now directly seek damages for serious privacy invasions.
|
